What We Saw
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9909/b9909c965cf2871072dfd2a9eac2ca795f18d6d0" alt=""
The picture at right shows the first storm....shortly after it developed. We estimate it took only a few minutes between the time it was a small tower and this blossoming cumulonimbus with explosively expanding anvil.
The formation of the base/wall cloud was very interesting. It formed as a detached scud cloud that drifted under the updraft, attached and developed the classic "bell shape" underhang, as shown in the photo.
This storm became a supercell quickly. And we followed it as it approached I70, at which time it put down a very brief weak tornado just south of I70. It had a very impressive radar presentation at the time. Our position is shown as a white circle on the radar reflectivity plot below.
This is about the time we encountered literally hordes of chasers. Large tour groups in vans, car caravans, and many groups of people with cameras on tripods, in some cases in the middle of the dirt roads we travelled.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33f40/33f407f0f7c618a9d757b0f86359f3895355eb8c" alt=""
We eventually found roads along which few chasers were clustered....and, eventually, when the meteorology got
somewhat complicated (the obvious storm was weakening and we expected development not the storms further south), it was interesting to see the hordes of chasers stay with the first storm, and we ended up alone with the second tornadic storm we intercepted. That experience was reminiscent of the experiences Thom and I had years ago, when we had storms "to ourselves."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36c07/36c0777deab1021643d29d6c4195b6da10a4b3ef" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17931/1793136ad9ad94481163eafdf7fa4a5ded73e627" alt=""
As we dropped south towards the second storm, we noted it had formed a wall cloud, dimly lit by the setting sun. Just at sunset it produced a beautiful tapered elephant trunk tornado. Our pictures are blurry because of the low light, but you can see the funnel, and then the "rope out" stage, in which the tornado shrinks in diameter, and is pushed around by the storm's forward flank outflow. In fact, in the last stage before sunset, the rope was so elongated,
perhaps for miles, to form a right angle, where the tornado was still in contact with the ground. I tried a panorama shot with my iPhone....and it too is blurry, but if you look at the center of the picture you'll see the forming tornado.
Forming Russell KS tornado, May 25, 2012. Sunset...literally. half the disk of the sun was right behind the tornado. This was about 5 minutes after the picture below. At first I thought the tornado was forming on a separate wall cloud, but now I realize that it was forming where it should...on the northwest part of the bent back horseshoe wall cloud (with the RFD reaming out the middle). You can see the RFD cut on the image below.
I've also posted a short movie shot with my iPhone video cam showing the anvil lightning associated with the LaCrosse KS tornadic supercell. That was the storm due south of the one we were on and it turns out that was the storm of the day (producing an EF2 tornado). We dawdled around too much with Storms 1 and 2 to make it down there by sunset.
I'll post more when I get more time. But this was another wonderful chase day for us, during a week filled with some frustrations, but lots of
storms.
Meteorological Blather
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/373f1/373f13fec111ee6667d9542353866367556160c6" alt=""
We'll be targeting the region north of a warm front/dryline/cold front join somewhere near, dare I say it, Quinter, KS (inside joke). This judgment is based before I see the 12 UTC run of the WRF-NAM...so the 06 UTC run and the latest run of the RAP.
There are differences between those, chiefly with the issue of CIN. The RAP forecast soundings in the area of a curious shallow ground-based stable layer or inversion for many places in that area, except just along I70 or so. Don't know why an inversion would be showing up, unless it's outflow related....it's not a frontal inversion, and it is very shallow. The WRF-NAM doesn't have that....
But both models have more than sufficient CAPE, for a change. What is striking is the ENIORMOUS 0-1 and 0-3 SREH projected by both models in the area bounded about 50 miles in diameter from a point somewhere between Wakeeney and Goodland. Geesh. Anyway, that is our target right now.